Saturday, May 30, 2015

more about P39 and the INTF Liste


P39 (ed.pr. =P. Oxy. 15 1780). It was distributed by the EEF to the Crozer Theological Seminary in eastern Pennsylvania (Upland). Crozer merged in 1970 with the Colgate Rochester Divinity School in the University of Rochester, NY, and its papyrus collection moved accordingly to the Ambrose Swasey Library; so the online Location List of Oxyrhynchus Papyri (given as The Ambrose Swabey (sic) Library)—a typo originating in the R. Coles print edition, Location-list of the Oxyrhynchus papryi and of other Greek papyri published by the Egypt Exploration Society, p.2, and reproduced numerous places since.
The CSNTM also gives the location as Rochester.
These papyri were sold at auction by Sotheby's. I append below the entry front he auction catalogue, since all the links I have seen to it are broken (here, at least is the latest url, and this links, for now, to a pdf of the same.

The Green Collection, Oklahoma City OK, bought P39, and has exhibited since at The University of Mary Hardin-Baylor.,

The TM 61638 (=LDAB 2788) gives the date as "AD 250 - 299 (date : W. Clarysse - P. Orsini, Eph. Theol. Lov. 88 (2012), p. 462 ...[AD 275-300])"
p.462=
The reason given by Clarysse-Orsini is expressed in terms of the stylistic evolution of this type of hand, "Biblical Uncial": "The canon ... reaches its peak...." But another reason is given by comparing P.Oxy. XLIX 3509Plato, Republic i 330 a2 - b4, because a document is written on the back, and parts of the front (published as P.Oxy. XLIX 3511), dated to the first half of the 4th AD.

Other similar hands are P.Oxy. xxii 2334 (GMAW2 pl. 26), P.Ryl. i 13, P.Berol. 13411, according to the editor of the ed.pr., R. Hübner (ZPE 30, 1978, pp. 195-96).
( ed.pr. G. Zuntz, De Pap. Berol. 13411, Aegyptus 15, 1935, 282–296 (P. 13411)
Below" P.Ryl. i 16
On the back of the above (P.Ryl. i 16) is a letter from Syrus to Heroninus (P.Ryl. ii 236), which has been dated to either Jan.11 256, or Jan. 10, 253 . 
So the third century date of P39 can be justified by the necessity of dating P.Ryl. i 6 before 250 AD not he one hand, and the consensus view that P.Oxy. xxii 2334 probably was written after 250. So it would seem the desire for a date-range of fewer than one hundred years must remain frustrated. 
But, consider what dating an undated hand means: the working life of a scribe of, e.g., between 20  and 30 years. So the limit of what we can know is not which year between 201-301 was a particular text written, but in which of 5 lifetimes (if we assume a 20 year working lifetime for a scribe) or 4 lifetimes (assuming a 30 year lifetime) it might have been A second probability, the length of time a book might remaining use before being discarded, is less easy to qualify.  A rough estimate for the reuse of documents is about 30 years (NOTE). But for books, we will first want to know why it might come to be discarded, in whole or in part. 1. Damage 2. loss of interest 2.a change of owner 2.b change in circumstances of the owner. Of these, damage might occur at any time, and so is imponderable. Change of ownership might have a strong link to generational change.  As for the remarkable claim made by Houston that books remained in 150-500 years, this is a matter for another time.


WESTERN & ORIENTAL MANUSCRIPTS
03 DECEMBER 2008 | 2:00 PM GMT
LONDON
Estimate  200,000 — 300,000 GBP
297,920 - 446,880USD









Gospel of John, in Greek, large fragment from a manuscript codex on papyrus a vertical piece, c. 250mm by 77mm., comprising approximately half of a leaf from a large and exceptionally fine early Christian codex, 25 lines complete with upper and lower margins intact, text from John 8:14-22,  written in a magnificent widely-spaced biblical uncial, original pagination for ' 74'  in upper left-hand corner of verso, approximately half of each line missing, other very small lacunae, between sheets of perspex, framed.


READ CONDITION REPORT
PROVENANCE
One of the finest and most celebrated early Christian Gospel fragments, perhaps the oldest or possibly second oldest surviving witness to this part of the text of the Gospel of John, in its original language. Written almost certainly in Alexandria, and used in the important early Christian community at Oxyrhynchus, in the desert west of the Nile about 120 miles from Cairo, partly covered now by the modern village of Behnesa.  Ancient Oxyrhynchus was principally discovered Bernard Grenfell (1869-1926) and Arthur Hunt (1871-1934), both of Queen's College, Oxford, who devoted their lives to excavating it.  The site furnished many of the finest and most precious records of early Christianity ever found, including the sensational 'Sayings of Jesus' (later known as the 'Gospel of Thomas'), as well as notable classical texts, including Pindar and Menander.  The present fragment was recovered by Grenfell and Hunt on 28 September 1922, and it was classified as P. Oxy. 1780.  Most of the Oxyrhynchus finds are now in the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, and the British Museum.  Some specimen pieces, however, were transferred by Oxford University to appropriate theological seminaries and colleges elsewhere, including the present piece which had been given by 1924 to the Baptist college, Crozer Theological Seminary, founded near Chester, Pennsylvania, in 1865.  It was later the alma mater of Martin Luther King.  In 1980 Crozer merged with the ecumenical Colgate Theological Seminary in Rochester, New York.  The present manuscript was Inv. 8864 in the Ambrose Swasey Library in the combined Colgate Rochester Crozer Divinity School, until their sale in our New York rooms, 20 June 2003, lot 97, $400,000, bought then by the present owner for what is still by far the highest price ever paid at public sale for any early Christian manuscript.  Since 2004 it has toured American museums in the exhibitions Dead Sea Scrolls to the Forbidden Book and Ink and Blood, where it has been seen by hundred of thousands of people.  The bibliography below takes no account of the manuscript's truly enormous presence now on Christian websites, DVDs and published videos.


B.P. Grenfell and A.S. Hunt, The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, XV, 1922, pp. 7-8, no. 1780; and XVI, 1924, p.279.

E. von Dobschütz, 'Zur liste der neutestamentlichen Handschriften', Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, XXV, 1926, p. 301 (mistakenly as P37), and XXVII, 1928, p. 218.

 J.H. Bernard and A.H. McNeile, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel according to St John, Edinburgh, 1928, pp. xiv  (as being in the British Museum) and xxix.

H.A. Sanders, 'The Egyptian Texts of the Four Gospels and Acts', Harvard Theological Review, XXVI, 1933, p. 90.

C.M. Cherry, 'A Study of the Oxyrhynchus Greek Papyri at Crozer Theological Seminary', dissertation, 1934, pp. 146-49.

P.L. Headley, 'The Egyptian Text of the Four Gospels and Acts', Church Quarterly Review, CXVIII, 1934, p. 206

E.M. Schofield, The Papyrus Fragments of the Greek New Testament, Clinton (New Jersey), 1936, pp. 273-77.

K.W. Clark, A Descriptive Catalogue of Greek New Testament Manuscripts in America. Chicago, 1937, p. 29.

J. Merell, Papyri a kritika Novozákonního textu, Prague, 1939, pp. 56 and 117.

G. Maldfeld and B.M. Metzger, 'Detailed List of the Greek Papyri of the New Testament', Journal of Biblical Literature, LXVII, 1949, p. 367/

G. Maldfeld, 'Die griechischen Handschriftenbruchstücke des Neuen Testamentes aus Papyrus', Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, XLII, 1949, p. 248, and XLIII, 1950/51, p. 261.

A. Merk, ed., Novum Testamentum Graece et Latine, Apparatu Critico, Rome, 1951 ed., p. 29*.

K. Aland, 'Zur Liste der Neutestamentlichen Handschriften', VI, Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft, XLVIII, 1957, pp. 49, 153 and 154.

J.M. Bover y Oliver, ed., Novi Testamenti Biblia Graeca et Latina, Critico Apparatu, 4 ed., Madrid, 1959, pp. lxix and 301.

K. Aland, 'Neue Neutestamentliche Papyri, II', New Testament Studies, IX, 1962-63, p. 307.

K. Aland, Kurzgefasste Liste der griechischen Handschriften des Neuen Testaments, 1963, p. 31; and 2 ed., Berlin and New York, 1994, p. 7.

G. Cavallo, Ricerche sulla maiuscola biblica, Florence, 1967 (Studi e testi di papirologis, ii), I, p. 49, and II, pl. 27.

K. Aland, 'Das Neue Testament auf Papyrus', Studien zur Überlieferung des Neuen Testamentes und seine Textes (Arbeiten zur Neutestamentlichen Textforschung, II), 1967, pp. 105 and 120.

J. van Haelst, Catalogue des papyrus littéraires juifs et chrétiens, Paris, 1976, no. 448.

K. Aland, Repertorium der Griechischen Christliche Papyri, Münster, 1976, p. 262.

K. Aland et al., eds., Novum Testamentum Graece, post Eberhard Nestle et Erwin Nestle communiter ediderunt, Stuttgart, 1979, pp. 12*, 49* and 275.

J.K. Elliot, A Survey of Manuscripts used in Editions of the Greek New Testament, Leiden, 1987, p. 5.

K. Aland and B. Aland, The Text of the New Testament, trans. E.F. Rhodes, 1989, pp. 57, 95, 98, 159 and 244.

K. Koester, Ancient Christian Gospels, Their History and Development, London and Philadelphia, 1990, p. 245 and n. 3.

W.J. Elliott and D.C. Parker, The New Testament in Greek, IV, The Gospel according to Saint John, 1, The Papyri, Leiden, 1995, p. 237.

P.W. Comfort and D.P. Barrett, The Complete Text of the Earliest New Testament Manuscripts, Grand Rapids, 1999, pp. 137-39.

J.K. Elliott, A Bibliography of Greek New Testament Manuscripts, 2 ed., Cambridge, 2000, p. 27.

Dead Sea Scrolls to the Forbidden Book, A History of the Bible, Murfreesboro (Tenn.), 2003, p. 9, and illustration on front cover.

M.H. Burer, W. Hall Harris and D.B. Wallace, eds., New English Translation, Novum Testamentum Graece, New Testament, Stuttgart and Dallas, 2004, p.15* and pp. 274-75.

P.M. Head, 'The Habits of New Testament Copyists: Singular Readings in the Early Fragmentary Papyri of John', Biblica, LXXXV, 2004, p. 406.

P.W. Comfort, Encountering the Manuscripts, An Introduction to New Testament Paleography and Textual Criticism, Nashville (Tenn.), 2005, pp. 20, 33, 53, 65, 107, 172, 252, 271, 288 and 353-4.
CATALOGUE NOTE
text
This is P39 in the standard classification of Greek New Testament papyri.  Grenfell and Hunt described the script as "a handsome specimen of the 'biblical' type, large and upright, ... unlikely to be later than the fourth century" (p.7).  Roberts & Skeat, Aland, Cavallo, and others moved the dating back to well within the third century, to which it is generally assigned.  More recently, Professor Philip Wesley Comfort writes (Encountering the Manuscripts, 2005, p. 172, repeated p. 353): "This manuscript displays the work of a professional scribe who wrote an early form of the Biblical Uncial script ... P39 lines up remarkably well with P. Rylands 16, dated quite confidently to the second / early third century ... and with P. Oxyrhynchus 25, dated early third.  I would not hesitate to date P39 as ca. 200".

Such a date, if right, brings the fragment almost as far back as any extant substantial records of Christianity survive.  It is less than 170 years from the Crucifixion.  In theory, an extremely old person in 200 could as a child have known someone who at the beginning of his or her own long life might have met Jesus himself.  Christianity was illegal in the Roman empire, practised in secret and in the catacombs, until the fourth century.  When it was excavated at Oxyrhynchus the present fragment was by far the earliest manuscript of any part of Saint John's Gospel then known.  Around 1952 the manuscript now Papyrus Bodmer II was discovered in Egypt, P66, also datable to around 200 A.D. overlapping with the text of the present fragment.  Papyrus Bodmer III, P75, found at the same time, includes large portions of John's Gospel and is ascribed too to within the third century.  Apart from these two, however, no other papyrus or vellum fragment includes any part of John chapter 8, and the next earliest witness to this passage is the Codex Sinaiticus itself, generally assigned to the fourth century.  If the date of about 200 A.D. is sustainable, the present piece is one of the two oldest witnesses to the text; if it is cautiously dated to the third century, it is the second or third oldest known manuscript.

The fragment has John 8:14-18 on the recto and John 8:19-22 on the verso, with the account of Jesus preaching in the Temple.  The people challenge his right to give evidence on his own behalf, rather than with the testimony of two witnesses, as required by the Jewish law.  He replied, " 'I testify on my own behalf, and the Father who sent me testifies on my behalf'.  And they said to him, 'Where is your Father?'  Jesus answered, 'You know neither me nor my Father.  If you knew me, you would know my Father also'" (verses 18-19).  It includes the cryptic and prophetical verse 21, "Where I am going you cannot come".

The Gospel text preserved here is extremely pure, graded by Aland as category 1 among New Testament sources, a "strict" text (Text of the N.T., 1989, p.98); "the papyrus evidently agreed with the best manuscripts" (Grenfell and Hunt, 1922, p.8, n.43).  The text is consistent word for word with the readings of the fourth-century Codex Vaticanus, probably also from Alexandria.  The present fragment is used for its textual value in all modern critical editions of the Greek Gospels, including those of 1951, 1959, 1979 and 2004.

Among excavated fragments, the piece is of substantial size. The script is a superb and spacious Greek uncial, the script especially associated with the earliest Bibles.  The writing is as fine as in any early manuscript.  "The large and beautiful calligraphy shows that this manuscript was probably produced by a professional scribe for church use" (Comfort and Barrett, 1999, p. 137).  The leaf was clearly from a codex, one of the oldest known, and it was evidently paginated (not foliated) by the original scribe, for it has the Greek number "ÏÄ", '74', at the top of the verso, one of the earliest of all books with contemporary pagination.  It is not possible to tell whether or not the recto was also paginated, since that side of the piece is missing.  Pagination, which is very rare in early codices, suggests that the volume was to be consulted at specific passages rather than read as a consecutive narrative, which is necessarily the case with scrolls.  Comfort (2005, pp. 353-4) makes interesting calculations by working backwards from the page number.  He notes that the scribe evidently wrote 330 characters on p. 73 and 333 on p. 74.  He then counts 23,796 characters from John 8:14 back to John 1:1 at the start of the Gospel.  23,796 divided by 333 is almost exactly 71½ pages.  This would not allow enough space for inclusion of the disputed passage of the Woman taken in Adultery (John 7:53-8:11), which cannot have been present.  It also shows, more obviously and unambiguously, that this was from a one-volume Gospel of John.

RED-2060 needs to retrieve related lots by ajax
SUGGESTED LOTS



No comments:

Post a Comment